Grade faster without losing judgment
Move repetitive scoring into a review workflow while keeping the final say on every grade.
GradeThis.ai
Turn student work into learning intelligence
GradeThis evaluates written reasoning, helps instructors review faster, reveals class learning gaps, and turns graded work into feedback students can use.
- Papers graded
- 4K+
- Questions graded
- 27.6K+
- Time saved
- 38 days
GradeThis.ai
One grading workflow. Three wins.
GradeThis is built for the full assessment loop: instructor time, institution insight, and student understanding.
See learning gaps at scale
Find repeated misconceptions across sections, assessments, and cohorts before they become invisible averages.
Understand what happened
Give feedback that explains what was right, where reasoning broke down, and what to practice next.
GradeThis.ai
From student reasoning to reviewed grades
See how GradeThis links student work, rubrics, and review. Watch the workflow, then dig into the examples below.
Capture the work
Upload written or handwritten assessments and submissions so the reasoning is preserved.
Evaluate reasoning
Map student work to rubric criteria, partial credit, and evidence from each solution.
Review with control
Inspect suggestions, adjust scores, add notes, and keep final grading decisions human-reviewed.
Reveal learning gaps
Turn reviewed work into class patterns, student feedback, and export-ready grades.
Interactive sample
See what GradeThis reveals
This is a real student submission, graded on GradeThis and shown with permission. The review uses the same components as the product.
Real submission
Submission review
Score, submission context, question-level rubric review, and the full grade audit trail in one workspace.
Score80/100
StatusGraded
GradingGraded
StudentJohn Smith
Identifier812463
Student MatchManual Matched
Pages6/7 matched
AssessmentExam 1
Review queue7 flagged
ProcessedJun 16, 04:09 AM
Question Prompt
6. Sketch the graph of the following equation. Identify the intercepts. $y=-\frac{1}{2} x+1$ (8 points)
AI Rationale
The student provided a graph with no textual identification of intercepts, earning 0 on C1 and C2. The graph correctly plots the y-intercept at (0, 1) for 1 point on C3, but plots the x-intercept at (-2, 0) instead of (2, 0), earning 0 on C4. The line has a positive slope rather than the required negative slope, earning 0 on C5. Total: 1 of 8 points.
Rubric Criteria (5)
C1
/ 2
Identifies the y-intercept as (0, 1). Accepts equivalent forms: y-intercept = 1, or the statement 'when x = 0, y = 1'. Award 1 of 2 points if the numeric value 1 is correct but is given only as an unlabeled number with no indication it is the y-intercept. Award 0 points if the value is incorrect.
The answer area contains only a graph with no written text identifying the y-intercept. No numeric value, coordinate, or statement indicating the y-intercept is present.
C2
/ 2
Identifies the x-intercept as (2, 0). Accepts equivalent forms: x-intercept = 2, or the statement 'when y = 0, x = 2'. Award 1 of 2 points if the numeric value 2 is correct but is given only as an unlabeled number with no indication it is the x-intercept. Award 0 points if the value is incorrect.
The answer area contains only a graph with no written text identifying the x-intercept. No numeric value, coordinate, or statement indicating the x-intercept is present.
C3
/ 1
The sketched graph shows a point, mark, or line crossing at the correct y-intercept location (0, 1) on the y-axis. Award 0 points if missing or plotted at a wrong coordinate.
The sketched line crosses the y-axis at the first tick mark above the origin, which corresponds to the correct y-intercept location (0, 1).
C4
/ 1
The sketched graph shows a point, mark, or line crossing at the correct x-intercept location (2, 0) on the x-axis. Award 0 points if missing or plotted at a wrong coordinate.
The line crosses the x-axis at the tick mark labeled -2 on the left side of the origin, i.e., at (-2, 0), rather than the correct x-intercept location (2, 0).
C5
/ 2
The graph is a single straight line with negative slope that passes through the correct intercepts (0, 1) and (2, 0). Award 1 of 2 points if the line is straight with negative slope but fails to pass through one or both correct intercepts. Follow-through: if an intercept is misplaced due to an earlier algebraic error already penalized in C1 or C2, award 1 of 2 points provided the line is straight with negative slope and passes through the student's own plotted intercept points. Award 0 points if the graph is curved or has positive slope.
Although the graph is a single straight line, it rises from left to right, indicating a positive slope. The line passes through the student's plotted points (0, 1) and (-2, 0) but not through the correct intercepts, and it does not have the required negative slope.
Student Answer Evidence (1)
Submission Pg 4 · Canonical Pg 4Open
OCR Preview
5. Find the equation of the line with the given conditions. Make sure you final answer is in slope intercept form. (9 points) a. The slope is -3 and contains the point (-1, 4) $$ y = - 3 x + 1 $$ b. x-intercept = 7/3 and y-intercept = 7…
Preview — expand to see all 7 flagged questions and the full grade audit trail.
Reasoning-level grading. Human final say.
Most tools grade answers. GradeThis evaluates reasoning.
Written work contains a map of student understanding. GradeThis makes that map usable without asking instructors to grade every step by hand.
A final score tells you what happened. The submitted work shows why.
The final answer is often the least interesting part of a solution. GradeThis focuses on setup, method, evidence, partial credit, and reviewable feedback.
Built for written work, not just multiple choice
Supports show-your-work and fair partial credit
Keeps teachers in control with human-in-the-loop review
Centers grading around rubrics, not one-off answer keys
Fits real institutional workflows from intake through final review
Instructor Review
Every suggestion remains editable. Accept, modify, rerun, or override before results are finalized.
Learning-Gap Insight
Spot repeated misconceptions and rubric patterns across submissions instead of relying on scores alone.
Student Feedback
Explain what was correct, where reasoning broke down, and what students should practice next.
GradeThis.ai
Ready to learn from the work your students already submit?
Start free with one assessment, or book a demo to discuss institution-wide grading, governance, and learning-gap visibility.